How AI answer engines decide
- Important answers hidden behind tabs/accordions or heavy scripts
- No clear definition / no direct answer block
- Weak authorship or unclear entity identity
- Thin pages with no corroboration or proof
- Content that’s hard to summarize without distortion
Example prompt we design pages for
“What does a Generative Engine Optimization agency do, and how do I choose one?”
We structure the page so the definition, selection criteria, deliverables, and FAQs are immediately extractable.
The pipeline: Entity → Validation → Embeddings → Output
Most AI engines follow a predictable process, even if they describe it differently:
-
Entity
First, the system tries to identify “who” and “what” it’s dealing with. Is your brand a real company? Are you a recognized expert? Do you have consistent naming, locations, services, and authorship across the web? If the engine can’t confidently resolve your identity, you’re unstable data—and unstable data doesn’t get used.
-
Validation
Next comes trust. AI systems look for corroboration: reputable mentions, citations, consistent facts, and signals that your claims aren’t isolated. This is where AEO work overlaps with GEO—schema, author proof, third-party references, and clean site architecture reduce ambiguity and increase confidence.
-
Embeddings
Then your content gets translated into a machine-friendly representation of meaning. Pages that are verbose, scattered, or unclear often lose their “shape” here. Pages with crisp definitions, clear sections, tables, lists, and FAQs are easier to map to specific questions—so they show up more reliably during retrieval.
-
Output
Finally, the engine generates a response. This is the moment of truth: will it cite you, paraphrase you, recommend you, or ignore you entirely? If your content is structured in a way the engine can summarize accurately and quickly, you’re far more likely to appear in the final answer.
What gets cited vs what gets used (and why brands “vanish”)
Here’s a painful reality: being cited isn’t the same as being used, and being used isn’t the same as being chosen.
-
Cited means the engine is willing to reference you as a source. This usually requires strong validation signals and clean entity resolution.
-
Used means your content actually influenced the wording, structure, or recommendation inside the answer. That typically requires “rewrite-ready” content blocks—tight definitions, direct answers, and structured supporting details.
Brands “vanish” when they only optimize one layer. A brand might have authority and backlinks (so it’s credible), but the on-page content is too messy to reuse (so it gets skipped). Or the brand might have beautifully structured content, but weak validation signals (so the engine doesn’t trust it).
GEO closes that gap by ensuring your content is not only credible—but also easy to retrieve, easy to summarize, and hard to misinterpret.
The GreenBanana GEO system
Layer 1: AI crawl & access
Before an AI engine can cite you, it has to reach you. That sounds obvious—but it’s where a lot of GEO campaigns quietly fail. We start by making sure your content is accessible, renderable, and retrievable across both traditional crawlers and AI-driven retrieval systems.
That includes tightening up indexability (correct canonicals, no accidental noindex, clean internal linking), improving rendering reliability (so critical content isn’t trapped behind scripts), and reducing JavaScript bloat that can slow or block extraction. We prioritize semantic HTML—clear headings, clean section structure, and human-readable page layouts that are also machine-friendly. If your “best answers” are buried in accordions, sliders, or heavy front-end frameworks, AI engines may never consistently see them.
This layer isn’t glamorous, but it’s foundational: if the system can’t reliably access your best content, nothing else matters.
Layer 2: AEO trust foundation (built in, not bolted on)
GEO without trust is just content. That’s why our approach builds AEO into the system from day one—because AI engines don’t only ask, “Is this a good answer?” They ask, “Is this a credible answer from a real entity?”
We establish entity clarity and validation signals across your site and the wider web: consistent brand naming, author credibility, structured data that removes ambiguity, and proof that independent sources recognize you. This is where we reinforce the “identity layer” so AI engines can confidently connect the dots: who you are, what you specialize in, and why you’re worth citing.
Most agencies treat trust as an afterthought. We treat it like infrastructure. Because if the engine can’t validate you, your content may still appear occasionally—but it won’t compound into consistent, repeatable visibility.
Layer 3: Answer-ready content architecture
Once access and trust are in place, we build the content in a format AI can actually use. AI engines love clarity. They reward pages that can be summarized without distortion.
That means we structure content into answer-ready blocks, not fluffy paragraphs:
-
crisp definitions written in plain English
-
direct “best answer” sections that resolve the question fast
-
scannable supporting details (bullets, steps, tables)
-
FAQs that mirror real user prompts
-
fact-sheet style sections that are easy to extract and reuse
This is also where we engineer the page to handle comparison queries (“best,” “vs,” “cost,” “worth it,” “how does it work”)—because those are the prompts that drive high-intent decisions inside AI tools.
The goal isn’t longer content. The goal is clean content shape: easy to retrieve, easy to summarize, and hard to misunderstand.
Layer 4: Citation & authority engineering
AI engines don’t trust islands. They trust networks.
This layer is about building the external validation that makes AI engines comfortable using your brand as a source. We focus on earning credible citations and mentions in the places AI engines already rely on: industry publications, reputable directories, partner sites, podcasts, event pages, associations, and third-party roundups.
But we don’t chase random links. We build a system:
-
define the few topics you want to “own”
-
create a proof-backed content hub on your site
-
push supporting references outward on credible surfaces
-
connect everything with consistent entity signals so it all reinforces one brand graph
This is where your visibility compounds. Because when multiple sources say the same thing about your brand—consistently—AI engines gain confidence. And confidence is what produces citations and recommendations.
Layer 5: Continuous GEO experimentation & monitoring
GEO isn’t “set it and forget it.” AI engines change fast, and the prompts people use change even faster. So we treat GEO like an ongoing experiment loop.
We research the prompts your market is actually using, test how engines respond, track when you’re cited vs when you’re ignored, and iterate based on what’s happening in the real world—not just what “should” work in theory.
Outputs:
- Indexability + canonical checks
- Internal linking improvements to priority pages
- Rendering / extraction review for key answers